On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 06:34:26 -0700 (PDT) "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 12:50:22 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 6:32:34 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > > Changing README.MD seems to be the simplest way to keep track of > > > the > > purpose and status of a branch. > > > > Alas, merging a branch into master over-writes the readme file in > > master. Naturally, this can be undone, but if it *isn't* undone it > > is a bother to restore the readme file. > > > > There is a simple workaround. Don't *replace* the standard readme, > *add *the branch description *in front of* the standard readme file. > That way, if someone mistakenly merges a branch's readme, it will be > easy to "recover" the standard readme by deleting the branch > description. One option: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3970442/1072212 another approach: https://stackoverflow.com/a/16455853/1072212 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
