On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT) "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Imo, Google's projects pages are poor. There is insufficient > organization and formatting features. > > Instead, let's use Leo's existing issues page for branch notes and > for project notes. If necessary, we can split existing issues into > as many sub-issues as necessary. The great advantage of using issues > for "everything" is that the formatting capabilities are good. > > I have added Branch-Notes and Sub-Project labels. Ok that's hilarious, crossed emails with the same conclusion, at least for the value of GitHub projects. 8-) A sub-project label is a good idea - then this url: https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20-label%3ASub-Project excludes all of them at once. So I think my question's answered? Labeling my issues LEP and Sub-Project makes them acceptable in the main issue tracker? Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
