On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:56 PM Brian Theado <brian.the...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...the @pytest.mark.xfail decorator ( https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/skipping.html#xfail-mark-test-functions-as-expected-to-fail) is useful for "a bug not yet fixed" which sounds like what you are describin g Thanks for this. It would have been useful. Here are two replies to my original posts. >> All the "one-line tests" run, even if some fail. This is the key condition, no matter how it is accomplished. It's a matter of attitude/technique. >> It's also convenient to "pretend" that the test passes even when it doesn't. That way the -x (fail fast) option doesn't bother us. The easy way is not to use -x. Again, it's a matter of attitude/technique. When using pytest --cov we *always* want to run all the tests. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3%3D6aFo%3D%2BbVYp-gtQbpbMkbUJ5rfpL1riEZUgFYx%3Dc%2Bag%40mail.gmail.com.
