>>> I've never had a problem with the term as used in Leo. To me, it conveys >>> 1) that a (clone) node looks different from another because it appears in a >>> different place, but 2) if you look closer, it's exactly the same inside.
I'm not saying that the term that the term should be abandoned, just that it should have the points that you see, mentioned more explicitly in the documentation. Personally, my understanding of cloning from biology lead me astray. "Clone" is as term of art, it's just that it's meaning in Leo is more specialized than it is in general usage. I've had trouble in the past trying to get my point across to Edward, I suspect that in part, this is due to different thinking styles, I tend to see thinks visually, coming up with a mental model, and elaborating on that so it has all the behavior of the system I'm modeling. Leo sucks me in every time I come back for a visit, (it's a pleasant side trip each time), currently, I've been pulled towards a review of the documentation. Going round and round with Sphinx trying to get a PDF rendering as I find that easiest to review. In a week or so, I'd like to do some teleconferencing with Edward, (not Zoom, but something with the ability to share computer screens), so I can do a show and tell on some of the stuff in Leo I'm working on. Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/0ad2cdcd-a9a2-490c-a625-1977b52dc935%40googlegroups.com.
