I'm not sure we are disagreeing here, and maybe I don't understand the state of the code. I'm saying that if the other commands are in there and working, might as well leave them in. That wouldn't be featuritis since no features would be added. I suppose you could call it "conservation of features".
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 4:43:19 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:22:57 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: > > >>Someone may be using [the session commands], someone who isn't following > this discussion. > > > That's always a danger. The compromise: encourage Félix not to > transliterate them :-) > > Imagine that the session commands disappear and someone is all hot and > bothered about that. Won't they be happy enough to learn that Leo's > sessions no work? I see no real reason not to reduce featuritis in this > case. > > Edward > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/9a43715f-bc7c-4965-bf5b-310391ab76b7n%40googlegroups.com.
