On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:33 PM HaveF HaveF <iamapla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://leo-editor.github.io/leo-editor/history.html
>
> Leo's history is intriguing. I thoroughly enjoyed reading everything
> except the change log section. Leo's history goes beyond the mere
> development of LEO; it encompasses a journey of discovery, enlightenment,
> and abstract transformation. I look forward to delving further into this
> reflective piece in the future. Thank you, Edward. If someone  haven't had
> the chance to read this document, I have included a few excerpts for your
> enjoyment:
>
> - I saw clearly that typesetting, no matter how well done, is no
> substitute for explicit structure.
> - much of the design work is not reflected in the code, because improved
> design often eliminated code entirely.
> - Furthermore, I could make @doc directive optional if the body pane
> started in “code mode”. But this meant that plain body text could become a
> program! This was an amazing discovery.
> - “We can use the following convention to determine where putDocPart has
> inserted line breaks: A line in a doc part is followed by an inserted
> newline if and only if the newline is preceded by whitespace. This is an
> elegant convention, and is essentially invisible to the user.
> - That’s the nature of big Aha’s: they obliterate previous ways of thought
> so completely that it’s hard to remember the time before the Aha.
>

Thanks for the summary :-)

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS0j2AVnezfPP9h4PfSgsf4C1NxgPRm9dsAOA2WER8y%3DcA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to