Started https://github.com/boltex/leojs/issues/160 for this. Thanks again to Inspired Mars for this suggestion! :)
On Monday, August 5, 2024 at 8:05:47 PM UTC-4 off...@riseup.net wrote: > Hi, > On 7/07/24 12:05, Thomas Passin wrote: > > Again, TiddlyWiki seems the model. In fact... a Leo plug-infor TiddlyWiki > would seem a natural! > > > I've tried TW at least three times over the years. At first I think it's > wonderful, then little by little I learn again that it's not quite what I > want. Quite an achievement, though. > > Regarding TiddlyWiki, I used pretty intensively from 2008-2010 and I > stopped using it as my usage of Leo became more intensive the last decade > and here in the local community went back to a combination between TW and > Lepiter[1], via TiddlyWikiPharo[2]. > > [1] > https://lepiter.io/feenk/introducing-lepiter--knowledge-management--e2p6apqsz5npq7m4xte0kkywn/ > [2] https://code.sustrato.red/Offray/TiddlyWikiPharo/ > > Being able to extend the application in a "liminal" way from its frontiers > instead of from inside is a better working approach for me. In the case of > the previous combination, by combining TW with Pharo and Fossil, I have the > advantages of all worlds and the disadvantages of none: A pretty extensible > and easy to use Single Page Application in TiddlyWiki, a powerful > interactive computing environment via Pharo/Lepiter and a simple > distributed collaborative system in Fossil. > > This has been the most effective way so far to deal with the technology > that is not "quite want I want", while keeping the tech stack simple. > > Cheers, > > Offray > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/7d3834f4-9d3e-4243-81e9-47d355a1feden%40googlegroups.com.
