This Engineering Notebook post explains why removing and restoring cell markup can not work reliably. The idea seems tempting. Why put up with all that cruft?
But this scheme has a fatal flaw: there is no *dead easy* way of restoring markup: - Cluttering headlines with the required data won't be pleasant. - Manually inserting such data (when creating new nodes) will be unreliable. - Using uAs won't work because they won't exist for newly-created nodes. The intuition is this. Leo converts an .ipynb file to an outline only once. But Leo will write the converted outline back to the .ipynb file many times. *Summary* Cell markup is essential. Without them, Leo can't reliably write outlines back to their .ipynb files. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/86a2ae01-b013-4987-b82a-9d3ea1766a9en%40googlegroups.com.
