leo-editor  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: A conversation with google gemini Mike Hodson
  • Re: A conversation with google gemini Mike Hodson
  • Re: A conversation with google gemini Edward K. Ream
  • Re: A conversation with google gemini Edward K. Ream
  • Re: A conversation with google gemini jkn
  • Re: A conversation with google gemini Edward K. Ream
• Could Leo use hypergraphs? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Could Leo use hypergraphs? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Could Leo use hypergraphs? Edward K. Ream
• More good news: Discrimination against DEI initiatives is unlawful Edward K. Ream
  • Re: More good news: Discrimination against DEI initiatives is unlawful Edward K. Ream
• what @language setting is in effect for a given node? jkn
  • Re: what @language setting is in effect for a given node? jkn
  • Re: what @language setting is in effect for a given node? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: what @language setting is in effect for a given node? jkn
  • Re: what @language setting is in effect for a given node? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: what @language setting is in effect for a given node? jkn
  • Re: what @language setting is in effect for a given node? jkn
• Some good news: Trumps tariffs are unlawful Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Some good news: Trumps tariffs are unlawful Thomas Passin
  • Re: Some good news: Trumps tariffs are unlawful HaveF HaveF
• Improving The Useability Of Documentation Thomas Passin
  • Re: Improving The Useability Of Documentation Edward K. Ream
• Leo 6.8.4 released Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Leo 6.8.4 released Félix
  • Re: Leo 6.8.4 released Edward K. Ream
• Expect Leo 6.8.4 final this Friday, May 16 Edward K. Ream
• Leo 6.8.4b1 released Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Leo 6.8.4b1 released Edward K. Ream
• ENB: About diffing scripts Edward K. Ream
• PR #4351 now in devel Edward K. Ream
• PR #4349 is now in deve Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4349 is now in deve Edward K. Ream
• PR #4348 now in devel. Expect 6.8.4b1 in a few days Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4348 now in devel. Expect 6.8.4b1 in a few days Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: PR #4348 now in devel. Expect 6.8.4b1 in a few days Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4348 now in devel. Expect 6.8.4b1 in a few days Thomas Passin
  • Re: PR #4348 now in devel. Expect 6.8.4b1 in a few days Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4348 now in devel. Expect 6.8.4b1 in a few days Thomas Passin
• Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change HaveF HaveF
  • Re: Discuss: push back against recent pyflakes change Edward K. Ream
• (share)deepwiki HaveF HaveF
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Edward K. Ream
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki HaveF HaveF
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Félix
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki HaveF HaveF
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Edward K. Ream
  • Re: (share)deepwiki jkn
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Edward K. Ream
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki jkn
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
  • Re: (share)deepwiki jkn
  • Re: (share)deepwiki Thomas Passin
• Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? jkn
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Thomas Passin
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Thomas Passin
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? jkn
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? jkn
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Discuss: What characters should be valid in @path directives? Edward K. Ream
• Tracebacks in plugins 'viewrendered3' & 'freewin' on Fedora 41 Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Tracebacks in plugins 'viewrendered3' & 'freewin' on Fedora 41 Thomas Passin
  • Re: Tracebacks in plugins 'viewrendered3' & 'freewin' on Fedora 41 Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Tracebacks in plugins 'viewrendered3' & 'freewin' on Fedora 41 Thomas Passin
  • Re: Tracebacks in plugins 'viewrendered3' & 'freewin' on Fedora 41 Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Tracebacks in plugins 'viewrendered3' & 'freewin' on Fedora 41 Thomas Passin
• Leo 6.8.4 b1 scheduled for Friday, May 2 Edward K. Ream
• Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' Félix
  • Re: Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' jkn
  • Re: Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' Félix
  • Re: Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' Félix
  • Re: Please discuss: branch 'felix-fix-script-results' Edward K. Ream
• A profoundly important YouTube video Edward K. Ream
  • Re: A profoundly important YouTube video Edward K. Ream
• PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel jkn
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel jkn
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Thomas Passin
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel jkn
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Thomas Passin
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel jkn
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: PR #4328 merged into devel jkn
• PR #4324 has been merged into devel Edward K. Ream
• TIL in Leo jkn
  • Re: TIL in Leo Edward K. Ream
• PR #4324 is ready for review Edward K. Ream
• OT: Wow. An overview of AI chips Edward K. Ream
• Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Thomas Passin
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Thomas Passin
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Thomas Passin
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Jacob Peck
  • Re: Heads up: PR #4324 will need testing Edward K. Ream
• In devel: PR #4320 improves Leo's annotations Edward K. Ream
• I am not seeing my own posts here! Edward K. Ream
  • Re: I am not seeing my own posts here! Edward K. Ream
  • Re: I am not seeing my own posts here! Edward K. Ream
• weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines jkn
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
  • Re: weirdness in key bindings when loading new/old outlines Edward K. Ream
• Please discuss: a tough choice Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Please discuss: a tough choice Thomas Passin
  • Re: Please discuss: a tough choice Edward K. Ream
• In devel: PR #4322 cleans Leo's code Edward K. Ream
• Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Viktor Ransmayr
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Syntax coloring bugs Edward K. Ream
• Re: 🚀 LeoJS 1.0.9 Released! Edward K. Ream
• Is there a way to ignore a node in an outline Karthik Suresh
  • Re: Is there a way to ignore a node in an outline Thomas Passin
  • Re: Is there a way to ignore a node in an outline Karthik Suresh
  • Re: Is there a way to ignore a node in an outline Jacob Peck
  • Re: Is there a way to ignore a node in an outline Edward K. Ream
• Re: I am on sabbatical Ray wang
  • Re: I am on sabbatical Ray wang
• Traveling in February Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Traveling in February HaveF HaveF
  • Re: Traveling in February Félix
  • Re: Traveling in February Edward K. Ream
• Leo 6.8.4 will fix several previously delegated bugs Edward K. Ream
• Three more PRs merged into devel Edward K. Ream
• Recent work and workflow Edward K. Ream
• Three more PRs are now in devel Edward K. Ream
  • Re: Three more PRs are now in devel Félix
  • Re: Three more PRs are now in devel Edward K. Ream
• NB: About PR #4279 Edward K. Ream
• ENB: An alternative to g.splitLines Edward K. Ream
• Programming is still my life Edward K. Ream
• new tree-specific binding losing old setting? jkn
  • Re: new tree-specific binding losing old setting? Edward K. Ream
  • Re: new tree-specific binding losing old setting? jkn
  • Re: new tree-specific binding losing old setting? jkn
• Studying Rust code Edward K. Ream
• Three PRs merged into devel Edward K. Ream
• VR3 Supports @pdf Nodes Thomas Passin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages