http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1667
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-07 05:49 -------
I think we really need to reverse that question. i.e. why should we use
mktemp's own versions of these functions instead of the one's we've already been
given by glibc? I can't think of any good reasons, therefore we may as well use
glibc's versions, right? Proposed wording:
"This causes the mktemp program to use the mkstemp and mkdtemp functions from
the system C library instead of its own implementation of them."
I think using common functions rather than custom versions is reason enough to
use that switch. Therefore making it explicit that that's what we achieve by
using the switch is enough to close this bug. Thoughts?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
