#2018: Glibc-2.6.1
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: matt...@… | Owner: lfs-b...@…
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0
Component: Book | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment(by mike3050):
Replying to [comment:11 dnichol...@…]:
> Replying to [comment:10 [email protected]]:
> > Replying to [comment:9 [email protected]]:
> > > From an operating system perspective the best solution is to build
GCC with --with-arch=i486, explaining that since this will be Glibc's
minimum it's improper to pretend applications will run on an
[http://zolpo.com/life-insurance/ life insurance quotes] i386.
> >
> >
> > I have been reconsidering the above, and I think will try this out on
the jh branch.
>
> I have nothing to contribute right now, and I haven't thought about the
consequences, but I think what Robert is proposing sounds like the the
cleanest way to approach this issue. I don't see a good reason to have the
compiler's target architecture be one that can't be used by the C
libraries. I could definitely be missing something, but I just wanted to
add a +1 from a distance.
Thank you for this.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018#comment:14>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
