#3506: contradictory wording about system headers
--------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kammet | Owner: lfs-book@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.6
Component: Book | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Keywords:
--------------------+------------------------
The very last comment ("Warning ...") at the end of Section 8.3.1 seems
self-contradictory:
"The headers in the system's include directory should always be the ones
against which Glibc was compiled, that is, the sanitised headers from this
Linux kernel tarball. Therefore, they should never be replaced by either
the raw kernel headers or any other kernel sanitized headers."
The "system's include directory", I take it, is our new LFS system in
/mnt/lfs/include, i.e., NOT the headers in the kernel tarball.
Shouldn't "that is," be replaced with "not"? Also, perhaps eliminate any
ambiguity by replacing (in the last sentence) "they" with "the system
headers".
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/3506>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
