Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Because the problem is actually if libc.a has been stripped with buggy binutils, removing the TLS information from the library. The only resolution would be to completely recompile Glibc.
What if binutils were just rebuilt using the same package, but leave the libraries unstripped?
I don't understand. LFS 6.0 uses 2.15.92.0.2. Is there a problem with LFS 6.0 or not?
No, LFS 6.0 uses 2.15.91.0.2. See:
http://lfs.osuosl.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
The buggy strip was not fixed until 2.15.92.* HJL releases, IIRC.
-J-
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
