El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 22:49, Archaic escribió: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:21:27PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote: > > To place entities on the files headers isn't a good idea for LFS, IMHO. > > Please explain what is not good about having all package-specific > entities in one place.
To place entities on the files headers (in the XML headers, like in BLFS) isn't a good idea for LFS. More clear now? > > Also, we don't need to declare the new packages.ent file on each XML > > file. Is enouch declaring it in general.ent (the same is valid for > > patches.ent). > > I'm not sure where that came from since I didn't suggest it. Is a comment for when that entities changes will be implemented. If a package.ent file is created, we can declare it in general.ent instead on each XML file (like was done for patches.ent). -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
