El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 22:05, Jim Gifford escribió: > I wouln't say it failed, I think we should just keep it architecure > specific.
It failed on their current form. The xpointer expesions used aren't useful for moving targets. That is the big issue: if there is a change on the nodes position in the target file, the xpointers that point to that file wll be wrong. > Don't do includes from x86 in MIPS and sparc. I think this is what > Jermey is saying. I see another issue here: how can we know that some text in some file is xincluded into other file? Knowing that some block is xincluded into other(s) files, we will know that other file(s) must be revised after updating the affected block. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
