On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:10:31PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > so, does releasing a LFS book with gcc4, a new binutils, and (hopefully > by that time a new glibc) not suggest a new major version number?
I'm not a big fan of such hard and fast rules. In this situation I would ask, "What is the bigger change? new toolchain or new build process?". I see no need for a 7.0 and an 8.0 in quick succession like we did from 3 to 4. Especially when you consider that by the time we wait for glibc HEAD to release, all the other major distros will undoubtedly already be using it, so I don't think it will be a big deal. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
