Randy McMurchy wrote: > [snip highly technical and best as I can figure, well-reasoned analysis] > > Thanks, Greg. I am interested in hearing from the pro-remove-headers > folks in response to your message. > > Hopefully, there will be continued discussion. This type of discussion > is, after all, what this list is all about.
This thread provides some more evidence for keeping the "Glibc headers" step: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-07/msg01206.html I think it should be reasonably clear by now that building without the Glibc headers is not kosher. I hope that Jim fixes the Cross docs upon his return. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
