Greg Schafer wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
I assume they've fixed all the problems with -fomit-frame-pointer?
What problems?
I can't remember definitive examples, I'm afraid. I just know that some
software either didn't compile or demonstrated erratic behaviour with
that flag specified.
But that is orthogonal to this discussion anyway. The GCC devs believe
that compiling GCC-4.x itself with the switch is desired.
Yep, understood. I just saw -fomit-frame-pointer in your original
message and the alarm bells automatically triggered :)
And just a reminder, this applies only to x86!
Well, that's OK...LFS only applies to x86 :) (officially, and if we're
not talking cross-lfs/multi-arch of course!).
Cheers,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
