M.Canales.es wrote:
On that table there is, among others, "crontab", "mailx" or "sendmail", that don't look very appropriate for a base development system.
I realise that. My initial proposal wasn't saying "We must implement everything mandated by the FHS, LSB and POSIX standards". It was intended to be read as "Does the proposed package provide utilities that are mandated by those standards". The idea being that fulfilling such criteria *may* help to add weight to the proposal. Having said that, obviously if someone suggests adding Sendmail (or some other MTA) to the book, it'd be thrown out on the basis of the other criteria.
Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
