Jim Gifford wrote these words on 08/08/05 01:40 CST: > So you will need to get support for adding PAM and cracklib to LFS, > which I'm not sure the community will support.
It was about 50-50 running with the CrackLib idea, however, some of the positives about CrackLib were adamant that PAM could *never* be an LFS package. I can't see PAM *ever* being LFS material. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 01:42:00 up 128 days, 1:15, 5 users, load average: 0.26, 0.20, 0.31 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
