On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:43:46 +0200, Dan Osterrath wrote: > But then anoher question: Why does /usr/include/bits/stdio-lock.h from > glibc-2.3.4-20040701 include lowlevellock.h, which does not exist on my > system? Did it exists in the kernel headers which were deleted after > successfully compiling glibc? > > ***** > Attachment not displayed. > Mime type: application/pgp-signature > Filename: signature.asc > *****
After you build glibc on an nptl system, those headers don't get installed. Also if you build glibc and try to install all those headers manually you'll create an even bigger mess. gcc-2.95 doesn't support nptl. I've gone through the whole spill through the headers and nada. If you search the web on the problem you'll become more enlightened. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
