Tushar Teredesai wrote:
BTW, has the LFS patch been submitted upstream? If yes, what was the response? If no (or even if it was rejected before), maybe we can submit it in response to the thread Matt mentioned.
The patch header just says "pending" - does that mean it's pending a response from upstream, or it's pending submission upstream? Anyway, looking at the comments in the patch, leads me to suggest it'll be rejected straight away due to the author's self-admitted hackish approach (lines 40-46 of the patch). Maybe someone could take a look at the patch and update it with regard to any improved/changed interfaces in the kernel and/or toolchain that are now available to us?
Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
