Anderson Lizardo wrote:

Yes, the lfswww group is still needed (and it needs to be synced
everytime commits privileges are given to someone).

Thanks. For some reason I was confusing the 'cvslfs' and 'lfswww' groups last night, and it was the 'cvs' related groups I was concerned about still having a useful purpose.

Regards,

Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to