Matthew Burgess wrote:
Sorry for not being explicit enough. Basically, as you've already eluded to, LFS-6.1, the nALFS profiles that are based on it, and the LiveCD that is dependent on both LFS and nALFS all need to be fixed. LFS-6.1 obviously can't be fixed in situ, so an errata will be published. nALFS would then implement the fix(es) specified by all the errata that apply to LFS-6.1, and the LiveCD would pick up the fixed nALFS profiles and also itself be built with the fixes mentioned in any applicable errata.
I believe that we shouldn't just have an errata section because then we have a dumping ground for errors and no way to really state that these new updates have been after those. So we shouldn't have LFS 6.1 + errata, we should have a LFS 6.1.1 "stable" release (because in a less perfect world there could even be a 6.1.2). This shouldn't require NEARLY as much testing/review as what is required to make a new stable release out of what is in 6.1 DEV. Steve -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
