Joe Ciccone wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I've heard no recent talk of cutting a testing branch from trunk in
preparation of a release, and in the meantime, I think we owe it to
our readers to supply a stable LFS with all these known items fixed.
I have personaly stopped building stable because stable isn't stable. I
do not know if the world is ready for a stable release with gcc-4.0.2
but, a few upgrades are required.
I hadn't meant cut a branch from trunk and call it 'stable' - that would
require a lot more testing. I meant take the current 'stable' book and
do whatever minimally needs to be done to fix each bug and re-release.
It really would be a 6.1.1 in that way.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
