On 11/14/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hernandez wrote: > > > I could be wrong of course... but why -exec if it's not needed right? > > Heh, because I was playing with find's synatx. You're probably right > there though. :) And it would be simpler.
Mike's solution seems nicer, but I'm glad you posted anyway since I didn't know you could throw multiple -exec's to find. Thanks for the pointer. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
