On 11/25/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Search the archives for a thread in the last few months where this > was discussed. Bruce went on to mention that supporting it in LFS > was prudent as there are so few packages compared to BLFS, and > manpower-wise it seems easier to keep in in LFS. > > Additionally, there are package in BLFS which require the autotools.
To be honest, these packages are not even required in BLFS. They can probably be added to <http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/other-tools.html> since they are programming packages. Additionally, as I have stated multiple times, you cannot just install the latest versions of these pacakges. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
