Matthew Burgess wrote: > I'm wary of adding 2 more packages just to test a tiny portion of GCC. > If folks are really bothered about this failure, we can just perform a > 'sed' (I'd imagine) to prevent the tests from running, with an > approporiate explanation in the book.
Yep, I understand and basically agree with that sentiment. I guess I was more curious of any particular benefit derived from this test, and I wanted to get an idea of others' opinions on it. Thanks, -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
