Feldmeier Bernd wrote these words on 12/21/05 09:44 CST: > absolutely not against the goal of LFS, > because pointing out how a sane working > system can be created has nothing to do > with any dev-tools installed.
A "sane working system". Is this what you call a bare-bones just-finished LFS build with no other packages. I'm sorry, but you just won't find many folks that agree with your analysis. > BTW, Greg did a great job with his DIY > approach that has also some optional > packs available. > > This and many more could be discussed here > and also the package manager debate could > be seen as an option like in Gregs great stuff. I can't help but think this is nothing but trolling. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 09:57:00 up 87 days, 19:21, 3 users, load average: 0.11, 0.12, 0.19 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
