Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>From that form, an editor would review submitted comments and approve
(with possible edits), reject with comments, or discard the input.
Approved comments would be inserted into the appropriate html page as a
part of the daily book generation, but not the pdf form of the book.
What do you think?
I think I still prefer the wiki. And re-establishing a properly
moderated and full-featured wiki could benefit the enitre LFS community
once again, not just BLFS. The only reason our old wiki was dropped was
because of lack of use and poor moderation. If we have more regular
users and a tighter setup, then the wiki could become invaluable to all
projects.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
