On 1/7/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for doing the analysis. I suspect we are probably going to move > to something like Tushar's method documented towards the end of > > http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
I kind of like Tushar's thing, although if you have to go back into /tools to work on something your specs file is hammered. Greg's solution requires a bit more typing, but is a cleaner break from Ch. 5. > I'm not close to starting testing for this, but I hope to get a round > tuit in a day or two. I'm also wondering if it will clear up some of > the 'transient' differences in my ICA analysis. I'm not testing it yet. Maybe not for a couple days. I was playing around with it, then just decided to go full blown analysis. > At least introducing Man-DB and Berkeley hasn't brought any new > differences, and Alexander's manconfig.h.in gives a better build IMHO. Awesome, and I totally agree about the coolness of manconfig.h.in. If you ever looked at the man build files, it's pretty hacky. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
