On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:34:20 -0800 Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/20/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, this broke jhalfs, because it assumes that the book > > has to be followed in the linear way. Further patches will not be > > provided until a consistent approach to this problem is developed. > > Manuel, please help. > > Alexander - > > Before you spend a lot of time making changes that move the UTF-8 > fixes to an appendix, I think we should see if that's actually what > the community wants. Jim and a few others have said they'd like this > to be optional on list in the past few days, and reading the IRC logs > from the other day shows a few others, as well. > > BUT, in the past when it was being decided if the book would become > UTF-8 compatible, I remember there being a lot of support for it being > on by default. I personally want it this way, and I think many others > want it this way, too. Default +1. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
