El Miércoles, 8 de Marzo de 2006 18:10, Dan Nicholson escribió: > I saw that and started making those same changes in my sandbox. > However, this could become pretty ugly. Perhaps if there was a > separate Optional Dependencies heading. Or Testing Dependencies. Or, > since LFS doesn't include that many packages, we could make a single > page with a table that lists all the deps. I think this was already > suggested before.
The most simplest is (at output look level): Approximate build time: 0.2 SBU Required disk space: 16.4 MB Installation depends on: list of build dependencies, like until now Testsuite depends on: additional dependencies to run the testsuites > Just for the case of automake and it's ridiculous test suite > dependency list, some sort of policy needs to be decided on. I'm for listing only LFS packages, adding a note after the offending "make check" commands discussing that some test are skipped due dependencies outside the base system. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
