El Jueves, 20 de Abril de 2006 04:46, Chris Staub escribió: > I like that new Appendix - great way to list all the dependencies. I've > attached a patch with some dependency (and text) corrections, as well as > a couple of packages that were left out entirely. Also, I have some > additional comments...
Thanks. > 1. Any instance of "DejaGNU and Expect" for testsuites can probably be > changed to just "DejaGNU" since Expect is run by DejaGNU. Not sure. If done, we will have Expect no listed as a dependency for any package thus, how could we to justify their installation? > 2. For packages without a testsuite, I think it would be more accurate > to label their testsuite deps. as "N/A" rather than "None". Agree. I will add that to your patch and do the commit soon. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
