El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 22:10, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> > unpack additional packages (like libidn, bash-doc or vim-languages)
>
> To me, this skews things badly. We've never ever counted unpacking
> source tarballs before.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ time { tar -xjf glibc-libidn-2.3.6.tar.bz2 ; }
real 0m0.071s
user 0m0.057s
sys 0m0.014s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ time { tar -xjf bash-doc-3.1.tar.bz2 ; }
real 0m0.791s
user 0m0.711s
sys 0m0.048s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sources$ time { tar -xjf vim-6.4-lang.tar.bz2 ; }
real 0m0.465s
user 0m0.405s
sys 0m0.042s
Not so badly. From your other post I think that the hardware used to do the
builds has a bigger impact in the final values than the unpack of that small
packages ;-)
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
