> > Kevin Buckley wrote: > > > To my mind, having a full list of of all the users and groups that > > BLFS users MIGHT require, presented to readers of an LFS book, is akin > > to going WBLFS - "Way Beyond LFS". > > Have you read BLFS? Specifically, > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/postlfs/users.html > > -- Bruce
I do apologise, I must have read your mail as suggesting that a full list (ie existing LFS and the above reffered-to list in BLFS) should be presented in the LFS book, so as not to cause extra work in BLFS, rather than just maintaining the status quo, as say, in the case of the existing LFS "audio" group. I can see, on re-reading you mail, that my original interpretation wasn't what you were actually aiming at. I am still not a fan of nailing down the groups in LFS, but that's more of a "my distro, my rules" viewpoint, arrived at once I had become educated. Looks like I did fall into Matt Darcy's catergory 1) of posters after all - apologies for the noise, Kevin -- Regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Kevin M. Buckley e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * Systems Administrator * * Computer Centre * * Lancaster University Voice: +44 (0) 1524 5 10155 * * LANCASTER. LA1 4YW Fax : +44 (0) 1524 5 25113 * * England. * * * * My PC runs Linux/GNU, you still computing the Bill Gate$' way ? * ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
