steve crosby wrote:
On 5/4/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
steve crosby wrote:
> My intent was to identify that one of the options provided in the
> thread (Jim's work with the linux headers) has problems, as it's
> currently not working with certain applications outside of LFS.
<snip>
>
I think I was able to build iptables with the 00.50 and above script. So
let me know.
I used the pre-generated tarball 2.6.16.13 rather than the actual
script, which failed in the iptables dependency checks (on
netfilter_ipv4/ipt_TOS.h)
FYI: using LFS trunk, with glibc 2.4, gcc 4.1.0, iptables 1.3.5
I'll try using the native script instead and see what I get. For
reference the LLH maintained the entire linux\netfilter*\* header
structure, and that works fine.
--
-- -
Steve Crosby
Thanks Steve, the pre-compiled ones are generated from the same script.
I'll have to play around, but as I've been told numerous times by the
IPTables folks, iptables is an addon to the kernel. Which I disagree with.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
