El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 23:29, Jim Gifford escribió:
> The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are
> ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the
> author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but
> that's not keeping a clean chain. That's my objection. If we are not
> going to provide the original author's sums, then we are no better than
> a distro.
All packages in the FTP mirrors are now in that formats used upstreams.
Justin do that change for BLFS packages several weeks ago, and for {C,H}LFS
packages this weekend.
Thus your complaints is not valid now, if we place the MD5SUMS into the books
they will match that packages released by their developers.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
