Alex Merry wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:58:54PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> Right. I get the same thing here. What I meant was, I think it's a bug >> in udevtest. The same comment "/* remove sysfs_path if given */" is >> used in both udevtest and udevinfo. However, it only works in >> udevinfo. > > The problem is that sysfs_init() (which initialises sysfs_path) is > called too late - after it tries to remove sysfs_path from the path. > > This patch should fix it.
I think this is a case where we should wait for upstream to fix the problem and not fix it ourselves. For now, our approach should be to explain the current functionality, even if its not optimal. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
