On Monday 25 September 2006 23:20, M.Canales.es wrote:
> ...
> > The only gotcha is in the last step because headers_install does `rm
> > -rf $INSTALL_HDR_PATH/include'. So, maybe we'd want to let it install
> > in the kernel tree and copy it ourselves. But, that's basically what
> > you'll be up against.
>
> At that point there should be nothing inside /tools/include, thus I see no
> harm in the `rm -rf $INSTALL_HDR_PATH/include'.
>
There is something coming from binutils as far as i saw in my test
installation so I would prefer the Matthews commands. Furthermore I think
it's simply more save. Imagine one comes to the conclusion (for whichever
reason) to reinstall the headers after having the hole blfs stuff done and
does not use the temporary directory. The /usr/include will be quite small
than...
Cu
Thomas
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
