Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/31/07 10:26 CST: > >> I'd say it's up to you, but if you reduce it to one, you need to >> acknowledge those who went before. > > I suppose I didn't describe my intentions/thoughts well enough. What > I'm asking is if we should continue to describe the previous books. > > This doesn't have anything to do with the personal commentary from > each of the Editors. It is only concerning the individual descriptions > of the previous versions. So, to condense: > > Everything stays the same. Only I'm wondering should we have the > two sections: > > "Preface to version 6.0" and "Preface to Version 6.1" stay in the book?
I think they should go, but perhaps the current preface should have a paragraph summarizing what the advances were in previous releases and what is being added in this release. And perhaps not. I'm just throwing out ideas. I'm comfortable either way. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
