Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/08/07 19:04 CST: > But that makes the book dependent on another package. Larry put the > images for BLFS into subversion in May 2004. I never noticed before > that LFS did it differently.
Didn't we just have this discussion? Or one similar? Seems we did. However, my take is that the images shouldn't be in subversion, but we should be getting them from the XSL Stylesheets. Yes, now I remember we discussed this. And I'm convinced that since we know that the stylesheets will be present (to render the book), we should use the ones we know are already on disk. 1) We don't have to piggy-back the images along as they are already available on disk. 2) The images are updated in our book as they are updated in the XSL stylesheets. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 19:13:00 up 29 days, 19:27, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
