On Wednesday 14 February 2007 19:36, M.Canales.es wrote: > El Miércoles, 14 de Febrero de 2007 20:22, Matthew Burgess escribió: > > Oh, and Manuel, if jhalfs is using any other workarounds currently, or > > needs to in the future, could you let lfs-dev know so we can see whether > > the book needs to integrate the fixes? Thanks. > > > > In an ideal world, jhalfs should be using the *exact* commands that are > > in the LFS book. > > Well, that work-around was needed due jhalfs is using a lot of basshims in > their internal code, not due issues with the book commads itself.
Thinking about this a bit more, now that we know that LFS needs to be built under bash, can we not just get rid of the workaround of doing `make SHELL=/bin/bash' in jhalfs and instead just do a config check on the host instead to see what the current shell is and bail out if it's anything other than 'bash'? FYI, although Ubuntu uses /bin/dash by default, /bin/bash is available on a default install so it shouldn't be hard for a user to get a sane environment. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
