On 3/23/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/23/07 18:20 CST: > > On 3/23/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't see an issue. Perhaps a short sentence (in para form) after > >> the "Package Information" bullets noting the difference in the name, > >> though they are the same files. > > > > As long as you don't see an issue, I don't feel like cluttering up the > > page. Moving on. > > Well, actually, I meant I don't see an issue with your proposal of > adding the other file name.
Actually, I was agreeing in the most vague way possible :) I meant that if you don't see an issue with the file name conflicts, then I'll add the new tarball but without any accompanying text. I don't want to write/format the extra text if it's unnecessary. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
