Ken Moffat wrote: > But, given that most LFS (and BLFS) developers think using anything > other than x86 is unsupportable, CLFS is the only way to go for other > architectures.
Ken, That is a little unfair. I don't know of any LFS or BLFS developers that think non-x86 is unsupportable. We have chosen to keep those books x86 only due to the personal preferences, the hardware available to them, and a preference of wanting to use the simplest instructions possible without IF $arch == 'x' constructs. We have no problems with pointing people to CLFS when it is appropriate. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
