On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:29:52 -0600
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The LiveCD project rarely hears much back from its end users, unless

> Of course any other thoughts or comments are welcome. We really just
> need to get an idea of how useful our project is to the community. If
> it's too much work to answer the above, just a short reply saying you
> use the CD would be helpful, too.

Whilst I applaud and support the LiveCD project, I don't use the
'product' myself, but I thought, for completeness, and out of respect
for the developers, that I should say why.  Read CLFS for LFS, I use
them both on occasion, but mostly jhalfs+clfs-svn these days.

1) It ruins the fun of discovering if LFS will build on a new machine.
This isn't true really, but it seems to me that some of the frison
of that first boot is lost.

2) Once I've got a rudimentary LFS running, then I would use that to
bootstrap the next model.  Although LFS has gotten so good and reliable
these days that it almost always: 'just works'.  Is there an advantage
to using the LiveCD as the base of the bootstrap?

3) Once, when I used a LiveCD (one of the original LiveCDs 2002-ish, I
can't remember whose), all I did was copy it to the hard disk and then
fiddle 'till it worked.  I didn't then build a native LFS for it, but
then it just ran the firewall - until last year!

Where I think a LiveCD can be useful is to help find out the
working baseline .config for the kernel, and maybe a starting position
for xorg.conf, although that's less problematic these days.

Of course if you've never run Linux before, and just have an Anti-trust
(hint: starts with M) box, then the LiveCD would be a revelation.  But,
writing my memoirs, I recollect throwing all my Anti-trust stuff out
after returning from a business trip to Redmond in 2001 - I remember
showering a lot too. (unrestricted submarine warfare is not an
acceptable business ethic) :-)

R.
LFS #207


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to