Hello All, After some little thought on the matter, it seems to me that the Trac ticket reports go to the wrong list. I can understand why lfs-book is the right list for commits. Those who are interested in discussing development of the book don't necessarily need to see all the commit logs. However, the ticket system contains info as to what is (possibly) currently wrong with the book and suggested changes. Often items like this should be discussed before implementation. Therefore, it seems to me that instead of having the ticket messages go to the commit list, they really should be directed to the development list.
This is a minor thing and I'll work with whatever is felt is best, but I thought it might help open up discussion if the items in Trac were more visible to all interested in LFS development. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page