Bryan Kadzban wrote: > First, we could simply remove the > last_rule options, e.g. with the following sed: > > sed -i 's/, OPTIONS="last_rule"//' 50-udev-default.rules > > since nothing that has this option set should have it.
That's one way. Another would be to write the appropriate seds to change the permissions/groups to what we use. A sysadmin could always override what we have by adding custom rules before 50 for desired changes. Perhaps we should create a file like that (say, 10-udev-custom.rules) with all lines commented. On the other hand we could just use their rules. I am looking at the latest rules and notice that all the ones with "last_rule" have to do with screens (pty*, tty*, ptmx, vcs*, console). They all (except console which uses the default) use a group of tty. Is that a problem for us? The permissions are: Device udev lfs ptyLH 660 660 ttyLH 660 660 ttyNN 620 666 <- diff ptmx 666 666 tty 660 666 <- diff vcs* def 600 <- ?? console 600 444 <- diff Which of these are 'correct'? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
