Bryan Kadzban wrote: >> I think we've given plenty of time for any users of the `tempfile' >> binary to have been updated now, so any remaining users should be >> patched to use `mktemp'. > > That's my first thought as well, but I don't know for sure how many > users there are. It looks like "none during installation", but who > knows if that's actually true.
I agree that we should change. If we don't get everything on the first go, dropping the package will soon highlight other packages that may still be using tempfile. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
