On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:48:41PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > As I've said to some people privately, I am willing to put in some time > into LFS/BLFS, but I don't want to be the only one. I would really like > to wake up LFS and BLFS development from its nap. This looks like > something that might be able to do that. > From my POV, it looks like the anithesis of what LFS should be about. Yes, individual users should keep track of what they install, but any package management process should fit the individual user's needs. For some people that implies a tool, for others it doesn't. Paco seems to be well-supported by its developer, but it isn't LFS. And if, by some mischance, a package management tool becomes part of the book, who is going to support the users who then want to update packages (particularly toolchain packages) ?
ĸen, still without time to devote to lfs. -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
